Monday, January 27, 2014

What Cryptids Remain to be Discovered by Mainstream Science?

Mermaids, Bigfoot, Yeti, Loch Ness Monster, Chupacabras, and odd-looking dolphins...What else remains on the “yet to be discovered" list of “mainstream science?”

Browse the internet and you too will find a slew of interesting articles about science's ongoing discoveries. "Scientists announce top 10 new species 2013" from Arizona State University, and "New Dolphin Discovered in Brazil" from, are just two of the many out there.

As you read these articles, you may wonder: exactly how much of the world has science discovered? How much of the mystery of life can “mainstream science” claim to know? Why is science given more credence than religion and paranormal occurrences? And what about the army of believers from all continents, who claim to have had encounters with other beings that science still cannot explain?

Religion is defined as “a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.”

This begs the question: aren’t science and religion related? Isn’t science itself a religion? What makes science believers more credible than the others?

What if we had all been fooled?

Could science itself be marred by its own legends? Could science stories – like “Ghost manifestations aren’t real, Mermaid creatures like Mamiwata do not exist, Bigfoot is a big lie, Yeti was never seen, the Loch Ness Monster is a fable, Chupacabras a fabrication" – be just that, stories? Could all the sightings reported by armies of people, from all continents, for centuries, not be the product of “unhealthy minds," but real encounters? Could all these denials by science actually be science's very own legend?

There continues to be countless examples of science contradictions, theories later debunked by scientist themselves. This link only list a few ( There are many more.

Who's to say that someday in the future they will not write this kind of article about many of the “unknowns” from planet earth and beyond? Among these expect to find “Mermaids, Mamiwata, Bigfoot, Yeti, Loch Ness Monster, Chupacabra, and yes, funny looking dolphins like the one recently discovered in Brazil.

The articles from Arizona State University and Science Magazine are simply more proof that science has yet to master the world (visible and invisible) in which we live. So until they can prove that phantoms do not exist, that mermaids are a hoax, that Bigfoot is a big lie, shouldn't we all keep an open mind about all these entities?

If you want to learn more about the legends of the African Evil Mermaid, remember to check out Mamiwata film

It's a paranormal horror movie based on real events and encounters with a mermaid. You can also find them on Facebook for a chance to win a $50 amazon gift card Or follow them on twitter for production updates

Click image for larger version

Join Eric Altman, Lon Strickler and Sean Forker
each Sunday at 8 PM ET as we go
Beyond the Edge!
Call toll free 1-877-677-2858 during the live broadcast

Tune in each week for a new and exciting podcast

Add 'Beyond The Edge' Radio to your Stitcher playlist!

If you like the show...give us your review!

 photo anomalist2_zps526a585c.jpg

 photo pamuseum1_zpse934bee8.jpg

"The latest news from beyond the mainstream"
Join Ben & Aaron for their weekly podcasts!
Check out Mysterious Universe Plus+ all access format!


Click to submit a sighting report or encounter


Phantoms & Monsters: Strange Encounters
Don't have a Kindle device? No problem...
Free Reading Apps: Your Kindle purchase can be sent automatically to your
Android, iPad, iPhone, PC, Mac, BlackBerry, or Windows Phone 7 device.


J.Griffin said...

The word scientist more directly connects with the word scientism than it does with the word science.

Scientism arrogantly declares that
"Only scientific claims are valid".

Says who?

Just because all "peer-reviewed"
pencil-pushers agree on something,
does that ultimately mean anything?

If they all agree that something is to be rejected,what difference does it make?

Isn't that to be expected?

They all labour under the same
pre-conditioned misconceptions.

I really find it HILARIOUS how most scientists treat an "unknown" as only a VARIABLE and cannot conceive that it might actually DISPROVE the rest of the equation instead!

while so many just love to throw mud at "religion" and then hide behind the skirts of science,
they forget that their patron saint of infallibility,
Sir Isaac Newton,not only believed the Bible but spent TWICE as much of his time studying The Book as he did studying Nature.

Back towards the focus of this article,
perhaps Clarke's words should be reconsidered-
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

It is not just that primitive people would be in awe of modern discoveries-
modern alchemists
(big pharmacy,computer corps.,
and military/aerospace,etc.)
hold their constituents and thralls FAR more firmly in check with the
"secrets of the guilds guarded by the scribes in the language of mystery"
than the old orders ever dreamed….
and their new puppets aren't even
aware of it anymore!

What witch doctor ever discovered anything as powerful to control as insulin?

It innocently started out as a well-intended medical miracle but why is FAR more of it being used than ever?

The problem with the "scientific model"
is that it is obsessively materialistic by definition….
yet matter really doesn't even "exist" except as a shadow because it is comprised entirely of energy!

What would old Newton think if he could see all this modern foolishness?

I BELIEVE that he would laugh,
then he would cry….
then he would begin to file a lawsuit to stop all these posers from using,abusing and defiling his name and his work.

No doubt there are many who work hard,study hard and are striving to serve humanity in the name of science…..
but they are not the ones in control.

More importantly,
don't EVER try to tell me that they are "infallible"….
they can't even agree with each other!


Robbie Shaw said...

J.Griffin,you said it better than I ever could have! Thanks!!
And thanks for the great article Lon,as always!

 photo phantom-encounter_zpsbrxtefmw.png

15% Off - All U.S. Veterans & Active Military / Spouses.
Use coupon code A1028 during purchase - unlimited use.
Thank you for your service & sacrifice!
'Phantoms & Monsters' Available Titles

 photo PHANTOMS-AD_zps5d68f2f3.jpg