Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Countries Demand Return of Stolen Artifacts

bbc - Global culture officials are meeting to discuss how to recover ancient treasures which they say have been stolen and displayed overseas.

Twenty countries are represented at the two-day conference in Cairo.

It has been organised by Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), which wants many pharaonic items returned by Western museums.

The SCA said the forum would discuss "the protection and restitution of cultural heritage."

Representatives include cultural officials from Greece, Italy, China and Peru - all of which have lost ancient artifacts over the centuries which that they now want back.

Greece has long demanded that the Parthenon Marbles should be given back by the British Museum, while Peru is taking legal action to try to reclaim Inca treasures from Yale University in the United States

Strategies under discussion at the conference include drawing up a single list of unique items to be returned to their countries of origin.

Representatives are also considering calling on the United Nations cultural body, Unesco, to amend a convention banning export and ownership of antiquities stolen after 1970 - so that they can pursue items that were snatched earlier, says the BBC's Yolande Knell in Cairo.

In recent years, the Egyptian authorities have stepped up their efforts to recover stolen artifacts, with the head of the SCA, Zahi Hawass, attracting international attention for his efforts.

Last year, he broke off ties with the Louvre museum until France returned fragments chipped from a wall painting in an ancient Egyptian tomb.

"We are the country with the loudest voice on this issue and have so far had returned about 5,000 artifacts," he said at the conference.

"We want to know how we can learn from each other, we need to co-operate to come up with one wish-list and fight until we return those artifacts back."

He has repeatedly asked for the Rosetta Stone - which has been kept in the British Museum for more than 200 years - and a 3,400-year-old bust of Queen Nefertiti on display in Berlin, to be given back to Egypt.

NOTE: As a former history and archaeology student, I can understand the requests...but torn by the loss of access to these artifacts for study that this policy would create. The SCA (namely Zahi Hawass) has a reputation of denying access to the inventory unless it involves a documentary where Hawass retains most of the camera time...Lon

Countries Demand Return of Stolen Artifacts

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

2 Comments:

Blogger Ai said...

Tough issue.

Though, some artifacts, namely that bust of Nefertiti have very shady histories. They were all but smuggled out of the country and never properly documented during their excavation.

I know Hawass is a controversial figure but he has brought to light a very real problem.

5:13 PM  
Blogger Cullan Hudson said...

Who is to say the Rosetta stone "belongs" to present day Egypt when it originally comes from a country far removed from modern Egypt? When the Rosetta stone was found, it was under Napoleonic occupation, thereafter under a melange of Ottomans, Mamluks, Albanians, etc... under the influence of various British rulers. The political state that exists now did not exist then, so the present country cannot claim that it was stolen from them. Not legally. In a cultural sense? Perhaps... And yet, if he weren't such a power-grubbing and greedy man (his formidible accomplishments not withstanding), I would agree with Hawass. So much has been taken by many countries - and not just the West (an obvious prejudice), but by countries like China and Japan as well. An agreement for sharing these cultural resources should be reached. We've much to learn about the past and ourselves by studying other cultures and coming to understand each other a bit more.

10:14 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual?
Send us an email


PREVIOUS POSTS


Please help support
'Phantoms and Monsters'
Thanks!




 photo veuliah_zps1bb3138d.jpg

* * * * *

Creative Commons License
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Hotlinking of P&M Network images and copyrighted material is strictly forbidden unless permission is obtained.

'Phantoms and Monsters' is protected under the Lanham (Trademark) Act (Title 15, Chapter 22 of the United States Code)


Disclaimer:
The publication of any and all content e.g., articles, reports, editorials, commentary, opinions, as well as graphics and or images on this web-site does not constitute sanction or acquiescence of said content unless specified; it is solely for informational purposes.

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social justice, and religious issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

You understand that all Content posted on, transmitted through, or linked from the Phantoms and Monsters Site, are the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. You are responsible for all Content that you post, email or otherwise make available via the Phantoms and Monsters Site. Phantoms and Monsters does not control, and is not responsible for Content made available through the Phantoms and Monsters Site. By using the Phantoms and Monsters Site, you acknowledge that you may be exposed to Content from other users that is offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable.