Monday, December 28, 2009

More Bloggers Jump Into MUFON Debate


Rick Philips at Barf Stew makes reference to the MUFON debate at FAA Makes Curious `UFO Call Statement' - As UK Shuts Down Same, in particular the MUFON 'Star Team' and Robert Bigelow's involvement in the network.

Quoting from Rick's post... Now, reading between the lines about Mr. Capp's assertions about MUFON and Lon's readers experiences (Joe's readers too) -- it doesn't take too much of an imagination to believe that UFO reports are now being `funnelled' - into organizations that may be less than forthcoming with the results - (In the links above you can see how some MUFON reports `vanish'.) - while providing the `cover' of real investigative interest.

Also... it seems mighty strange for the FAA to give one damn about who those reports should go to by the MOST BELIEVABLE AUTHORITIES - PILOTS AND AIR CONTROL --- and then - for THAT company to have ANY link to MUFON - doubles that strangeness.

Or, could this be a way for Mr. Bigelow - to be positioned by our government - as the ultimate spokesperson for `Anomalous Disclosure' to the world?


It's a very interesting post...go to FAA Makes Curious `UFO Call Statement' - As UK Shuts Down Same and leave a comment.
____________________________

NOTE: I found the following tidbit in reference to a supposed 'deal' a MUFON executive and Robert Bigelow had in 2000. Here is the link to the source OUTRAGE OVER JOHN CARPENTER'S ETHICS, OR LACK THEREOF. Apparently, Larry Bryant, then Director of Governmental Affairs for MUFON was upset about the fact that John Carpenter, MUFON's Director of Abduction Research, had apparently sold 140 abduction case histories to Robert Bigelow for the sum of $14,000. It begs the question...how much involvement has Bigelow and his companies had with MUFON over the years? Lon

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Have you had a close encounter or witnessed something unusual?
Send us an email


PREVIOUS POSTS


Please help support
'Phantoms and Monsters'
Thanks!




 photo veuliah_zps1bb3138d.jpg

* * * * *

Creative Commons License
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Hotlinking of P&M Network images and copyrighted material is strictly forbidden unless permission is obtained.

'Phantoms and Monsters' is protected under the Lanham (Trademark) Act (Title 15, Chapter 22 of the United States Code)


Disclaimer:
The publication of any and all content e.g., articles, reports, editorials, commentary, opinions, as well as graphics and or images on this web-site does not constitute sanction or acquiescence of said content unless specified; it is solely for informational purposes.

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social justice, and religious issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

You understand that all Content posted on, transmitted through, or linked from the Phantoms and Monsters Site, are the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. You are responsible for all Content that you post, email or otherwise make available via the Phantoms and Monsters Site. Phantoms and Monsters does not control, and is not responsible for Content made available through the Phantoms and Monsters Site. By using the Phantoms and Monsters Site, you acknowledge that you may be exposed to Content from other users that is offensive, indecent, inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable.